Table of Contents
In December 2004 the International Accounting Standards Board issued IFRS 6 Exploration
for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources.
Other Standards have made minor consequential amendments to IFRS 6, including
Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards (issued March 2018).
International Financial Reporting Standard 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral
Resources (IFRS 6) is set out in paragraphs 1–27 and Appendices A and B. All the
paragraphs have equal authority. Paragraphs in bold type state the main principles.
Terms defined in Appendix A are in italics the first time they appear in the Standard.
Definitions of other terms are given in the Glossary for International Financial
Reporting Standards. IFRS 6 should be read in the context of its objective and the Basis
for Conclusions, the Preface to IFRS Standards and the Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors provides a
basis for selecting and applying accounting policies in the absence of explicit guidance.
The objective of this IFRS is to specify the financial reporting for the
exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
In particular, the IFRS requires:
(a) limited improvements to existing accounting practices for exploration
and evaluation expenditures.
(b) entities that recognise exploration and evaluation assets to assess such
assets for impairment in accordance with this IFRS and measure any
impairment in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
(c) disclosures that identify and explain the amounts in the entity’s
financial statements arising from the exploration for and evaluation of
mineral resources and help users of those financial statements
understand the amount, timing and certainty of future cash flows
from any exploration and evaluation assets recognised.
An entity shall apply the IFRS to exploration and evaluation expenditures that
it incurs.
The IFRS does not address other aspects of accounting by entities engaged in
the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
An entity shall not apply the IFRS to expenditures incurred:
(a) before the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources, such as
expenditures incurred before the entity has obtained the legal rights to
explore a specific area.
(b) after the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a
mineral resource are demonstrable.
When developing its accounting policies, an entity recognising exploration
and evaluation assets shall apply paragraph 10 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies,
Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
Paragraphs 11 and 12 of IAS 8 specify sources of authoritative requirements
and guidance that management is required to consider in developing an
accounting policy for an item if no IFRS applies specifically to that item.
Subject to paragraphs 9 and 10 below, this IFRS exempts an entity from applying those paragraphs to its accounting policies for the recognition and
measurement of exploration and evaluation assets.
Exploration and evaluation assets shall be measured at cost.
An entity shall determine an accounting policy specifying which expenditures
are recognised as exploration and evaluation assets and apply the policy
consistently. In making this determination, an entity considers the degree to
which the expenditure can be associated with finding specific mineral
resources. The following are examples of expenditures that might be included
in the initial measurement of exploration and evaluation assets (the list is not
exhaustive):
(a) acquisition of rights to explore;
(b) topographical, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies;
(c) exploratory drilling;
(d) trenching;
(e) sampling; and
(f) activities in relation to evaluating the technical feasibility and
commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.
Expenditures related to the development of mineral resources shall not be
recognised as exploration and evaluation assets. The Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting and IAS 38 Intangible Assets provide guidance on the
recognition of assets arising from development.
In accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets an
entity recognises any obligations for removal and restoration that are incurred
during a particular period as a consequence of having undertaken the
exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
After recognition, an entity shall apply either the cost model or the
revaluation model to the exploration and evaluation assets. If the revaluation
model is applied (either the model in IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment or the
model in IAS 38) it shall be consistent with the classification of the assets (see
paragraph 15).
An entity may change its accounting policies for exploration and
evaluation expenditures if the change makes the financial statements more
relevant to the economic decision-making needs of users and no less
reliable, or more reliable and no less relevant to those needs. An entity
shall judge relevance and reliability using the criteria in IAS 8.
To justify changing its accounting policies for exploration and evaluation
expenditures, an entity shall demonstrate that the change brings its financial
statements closer to meeting the criteria in IAS 8, but the change need not
achieve full compliance with those criteria.
An entity shall classify exploration and evaluation assets as tangible or
intangible according to the nature of the assets acquired and apply the
classification consistently.
Some exploration and evaluation assets are treated as intangible (eg drilling
rights), whereas others are tangible (eg vehicles and drilling rigs). To the
extent that a tangible asset is consumed in developing an intangible asset, the
amount reflecting that consumption is part of the cost of the intangible asset.
However, using a tangible asset to develop an intangible asset does not change
a tangible asset into an intangible asset.
An exploration and evaluation asset shall no longer be classified as such when
the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral
resource are demonstrable. Exploration and evaluation assets shall be assessed
for impairment, and any impairment loss recognised, before reclassification.
Exploration and evaluation assets shall be assessed for impairment when
facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an
exploration and evaluation asset may exceed its recoverable amount. When
facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the
recoverable amount, an entity shall measure, present and disclose any
resulting impairment loss in accordance with IAS 36, except as provided by
paragraph 21 below.
For the purposes of exploration and evaluation assets only, paragraph 20 of
this IFRS shall be applied rather than paragraphs 8–17 of IAS 36 when
identifying an exploration and evaluation asset that may be impaired.
Paragraph 20 uses the term ‘assets’ but applies equally to separate exploration
and evaluation assets or a cash-generating unit.
One or more of the following facts and circumstances indicate that an entity
should test exploration and evaluation assets for impairment (the list is not
exhaustive):
(a) the period for which the entity has the right to explore in the specific
area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future,
and is not expected to be renewed.
(b) substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of
mineral resources in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned.
(c) exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area
have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of
mineral resources and the entity has decided to discontinue such
activities in the specific area.
(d) sufficient data exist to indicate that, although a development in the
specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the
exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full
from successful development or by sale.
In any such case, or similar cases, the entity shall perform an impairment test
in accordance with IAS 36. Any impairment loss is recognised as an expense in
accordance with IAS 36.
An entity shall determine an accounting policy for allocating exploration
and evaluation assets to cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating
units for the purpose of assessing such assets for impairment. Each
cash-generating unit or group of units to which an exploration and
evaluation asset is allocated shall not be larger than an operating segment
determined in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments.
The level identified by the entity for the purposes of testing exploration and
evaluation assets for impairment may comprise one or more cash-generating
units.
An entity shall disclose information that identifies and explains the
amounts recognised in its financial statements arising from the
exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources.
To comply with paragraph 23, an entity shall disclose:
(a) its accounting policies for exploration and evaluation
expenditures including the recognition of exploration and evaluation
assets.
(b) the amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expense and operating
and investing cash flows arising from the exploration for and
evaluation of mineral resources.
An entity shall treat exploration and evaluation assets as a separate class of
assets and make the disclosures required by either IAS 16 or IAS 38 consistent
with how the assets are classified.
An entity shall apply this IFRS for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2006. Earlier application is encouraged. If an entity applies the IFRS
for a period beginning before 1 January 2006, it shall disclose that fact.
Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards, issued in
2018, amended paragraph 10. An entity shall apply that amendment for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2020. Earlier application is
permitted if at the same time an entity also applies all other amendments
made by Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards.
An entity shall apply the amendment to IFRS 6 retrospectively in accordance
with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. However,
if an entity determines that retrospective application would be impracticable
or would involve undue cost or effort, it shall apply the amendment to IFRS 6
by reference to paragraphs 23–28, 50–53 and 54F of IAS 8.
If it is impracticable to apply a particular requirement of paragraph 18 to
comparative information that relates to annual periods beginning before
1 January 2006, an entity shall disclose that fact. IAS 8 explains the term
‘impracticable’.
This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS.
exploration and
evaluation assets
Exploration and evaluation expenditures recognised as assets
in accordance with the entity’s accounting policy.
exploration and
evaluation
expenditures
Expenditures incurred by an entity in connection with the
exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources before
the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a
mineral resource are demonstrable.
exploration for and
evaluation of mineral
resources
The search for mineral resources, including minerals, oil,
natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources after the
entity has obtained legal rights to explore in a specific area, as
well as the determination of the technical feasibility and
commercial viability of extracting the mineral resource.
The amendments in this appendix shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January
2006. If an entity applies this IFRS for an earlier period, these amendments shall be applied for that
earlier period.
* * * * *
The amendments contained in this appendix when this IFRS was issued in 2004 have been
incorporated into the relevant IFRSs published in this volume.
International Financial Reporting Standard 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral
Resources was approved for issue by ten of the fourteen members of the International
Accounting Standards Board. Messrs Garnett, Leisenring, McGregor and Smith dissented.
Their dissenting opinions are set out after the Basis for Conclusions.
Sir David Tweedie Chairman
Thomas E Jones Vice-Chairman
Mary E Barth
Hans-Georg Bruns
Anthony T Cope
Jan Engström
Robert P Garnett
Gilbert Gélard
James J Leisenring
Warren J McGregor
Patricia L O’Malley
John T Smith
Geoffrey Whittington
Tatsumi Yamada
These Amendments to International Financial Reporting Standard 1 First-time Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standard 6
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources were approved for issue by the fourteen
members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
Sir David Tweedie Chairman
Thomas E Jones Vice-Chairman
Mary E Barth
Hans-Georg Bruns
Anthony T Cope
Jan Engström
Robert P Garnett
Gilbert Gélard
James J Leisenring
Warren J McGregor
Patricia L O’Malley
John T Smith
Geoffrey Whittington
Tatsumi Yamada